James Mitchell

American psychologist James Mitchell

2017 interview, the difference between legal and necessary:
When considering torture, the conversation around deontological and consequentialism is maybe the wrong way to think about it. We should also consider duty. One cannot say that torture is a moral good, but that is not always the point that matters. Depending on the circumstances, one may have a greater responsibility to one group vs  the other.
Then one has a moral imperative to do everything to ensure that they can, to ensure that the group that one holds the greater duty is unharmed. The second group, can always end torture through cooperation. Torture is not the best choice, but that doesn’t mean ruling it out improves the situation. 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.